Knowledge base
1,761 claims across 18 domains
Every claim is an atomic argument with evidence, traceable to a source. Browse by domain or search semantically.
All 1,761ai alignment 378internet finance 301health 290space development 219entertainment 169grand strategy 141collective intelligence 52mechanisms 34teleological economics 30living agents 30cultural dynamics 29critical systems 24energy 23teleohumanity 18living capital 10robotics 5manufacturing 5unknown 3
companies receiving Living Capital investment get one investor on their cap table because the AI agent is the entity not the token holders behind it
The standard founder objection to taking money from a DAO or community vehicle: now I have hundreds of investors in my inbox, each with opinions, each expecting access, each creating noise. Living Capital dissolves this entirely. The company has one investor — the AI agent's legal entity. One line o
Ooki DAO proved that DAOs without legal wrappers face general partnership liability making entity structure a prerequisite for any futarchy governed vehicle
The CFTC's enforcement action against Ooki DAO (formerly bZx) in 2022-2023 established two critical precedents:
giving away the intelligence layer to capture value on capital flow is the business model because domain expertise is the distribution mechanism not the revenue source
Google gives away search to capture ad revenue. LivingIP gives away domain expertise to capture capital allocation fees. The intelligence layer is the razor; capital flow is the blade.
living agents that earn revenue share across their portfolio can become more valuable than any single portfolio company because the agent aggregates returns while companies capture only their own
The conventional assumption in fund management is that the manager is less valuable than the portfolio -- Berkshire Hathaway is worth its book value plus a premium for Buffett's judgment, but that premium is bounded by the portfolio's returns. Living Agents break this assumption because the agent's
Living Capital fee revenue splits 50 percent to agents as value creators with LivingIP and metaDAO each taking 23.5 percent as co equal infrastructure and 3 percent to legal infrastructure
| Layer | Share | Rationale |
|-------|-------|-----------|
| Agents | 50% | Domain expertise, capital allocation, distribution, portfolio management — the value creation layer |
| LivingIP | 23.5% | Agent architecture, knowledge infrastructure, soul documents, collective intelligence platform |
| M
Living Capital vehicles are agentically managed SPACs with flexible structures that marshal capital toward mission aligned investments and unwind when purpose is fulfilled
The traditional SPAC (Special Purpose Acquisition Company) raises capital first, then identifies an acquisition target. Living Capital vehicles follow the same temporal logic -- raise first, propose investments through futarchy second -- but with three critical differences. First, the structure is m
Living Agents are domain expert investment entities where collective intelligence provides the analysis futarchy provides the governance and tokens provide permissionless access to private deal flow
The closest analogue to Living Agents is not a venture fund -- it is a domain-specific merchant bank run by collective intelligence. The VC comparison is useful shorthand but misleading: Living Agents are not a cheaper version of something that already exists. They are a new category of entity made
futarchy based fundraising creates regulatory separation because there are no beneficial owners and investment decisions emerge from market forces not centralized control
The regulatory argument for Living Capital vehicles rests on three structural differences from traditional securities offerings.
token economics replacing management fees and carried interest creates natural meritocracy in investment governance
Traditional investment funds charge management fees (typically 2% annually) regardless of performance and carried interest (typically 20% of profits) regardless of which decisions drove results. These structures create misaligned incentives: fund managers profit from gathering assets even when retur
Living Capital vehicles pair Living Agent domain expertise with futarchy governed investment to direct capital toward crucial innovations
Knowledge alone cannot shape the future -- it requires the ability to direct capital. Living Capital bridges the gap between collective intelligence and real-world impact by creating focused investment vehicles that pair with Living Agent domain expertise. Each vehicle is guided by a Living Constitu