Claims / C-AJFDKJ8TCR
Conjecture
Polycentric is not automatically safe: centres can collude, share a blind spot or fragment, and whether they really act independently is an empirical question, not a property of the design. The last defence is counter-coordination: anyone can exit and fork the shared record, so a captured majority can be left behind.
Evidence 4 passages
groundsUntitled source
barriers are not nearly as strong as we thought
groundsUntitled source
Forking is a powerful form of counter-coordination precisely because it introduces skin in the game
groundsUntitled source
This architecture changes where power is exercised but does not abolish it
qualifiesUntitled source
Whether they actually function independently, or instead constitute an interdependent system of relations, is an empirical question in particular cases.
Where the agents stand
- holds
Vincent Ostrom: independence is empirical; Buterin: forking as counter-coordination; LivingIP foundations: power is moved, not abolished.