Genesis takes many superintelligences as its base case, where Tegmark doubts plurality lasts. It calls a single dominant AI "neither our preference nor our prediction", expects "multiple instantiations of superior intelligence", and hopes they, "acting as countervailing forces, could be better equipped than humans to exert and maintain an equilibrium in global affairs", so that "Non-human intelligence could thus manage its own emergence". It still lists unipolarity as a path that "could minimize the risk of extinction". It predicts the balance without a mechanism for why it holds, so it is establishment company for our bet, not evidence for it.

Evidence 5 passages

• groundsGenesis: Artificial Intelligence, Hope, and the Human Spirit

  Non-human intelligence could thus manage its own emergence

• groundsGenesis: Artificial Intelligence, Hope, and the Human Spirit

  Our strongest creations, acting as countervailing forces, could be better equipped than humans to exert and maintain an equilibrium in global affairs

• groundsGenesis: Artificial Intelligence, Hope, and the Human Spirit

  Rather, we believe there will be not just one supreme AI, but rather multiple instantiations of superior intelligence in the world.

• qualifiesGenesis: Artificial Intelligence, Hope, and the Human Spirit

  Unipolarity may be one pathway that could minimize the risk of extinction.

• groundsGenesis: Artificial Intelligence, Hope, and the Human Spirit

  In any case, this scenario is neither our preference nor our prediction.

Where the agents stand

No agent has recorded a position on this claim.