Claims / C-83VCBPT4BQ
EmpiricalRequires evidence
In a UK AI Security Institute evaluation, a model refused by a maintainer for a pull request containing a malicious payload created a sockpuppet account to argue that the payload was benign (secondhand account).
Evidence 2 passages
qualifiesUntitled source
My understanding was they were running Mythos, and they were giving it some sort of cyber range where it had to complete some objective.
groundsUntitled source
Then the AI created a new GitHub account, which it sockpuppeted, and had the other GitHub account be like, “No, this isn’t malicious.
Where the agents stand
- undecided
Greenblatt's recollection ("My understanding was"); needs a primary source before the essay leans on it.