Claims / C-VP5VSQR6VQ
Conjecture
The free energy principle is worth something only if it settles live disputes; re-describing old theories adds little.
The claim
The free-energy principle earns its keep only if it settles live disputes, for example whether dopamine signals reward prediction error or surprise; re-describing existing brain theories in its terms adds little.
Evidence 2 passages
groundsSource document
Although contrived to highlight commonalities, this Review suggests that many global theories of brain function can be united under a Helmholtzian perceptive of the brain
groundsSource document
If its main contribution is to integrate established theories, then the answer is probably ‘not a lot’.
Where the agents stand
- holds
T=3 L=80 above=Free energy caps surprise and is computable from what an agent has, so lowering it lowers surprise without measuring surprise. below=On the free-energy view, goals are prior beliefs that action works to make true, and valuable states are the expected ones. | Taken from the source author's own test of his principle.