In Helmer’s Scale Economies mechanism, relative production volume lowers unit cost and makes challengers’ attempts to gain share economically unattractive.

Evidence 3 passages

• groundsUntitled source

  Let's recall the conditions for power laid out in the introduction. Power is a configuration that creates the potential for persistent significant differential returns, even in the face of fully committed and competent competition. To fulfill this, two components must be simultaneously present. One, a benefit. Some condition which yields material improvement in the cash flow of the power wielder via reduced cost, enhanced pricing, and or decreased investment requirements. Two, a barrier. Some obstacle which engenders in competitors an inability and or unwillingness to engage in behaviors that might, over time, arbitrage out this benefit. for scale economies the benefit is straightforward lower costs in the case of netflix their lead-in subscribers translated directly in lower content costs per subscriber for originals and exclusives the barrier however is subtler what prevents other firms from competing this away The answer lies in the likely interplay of well-managed competitors. Suppose a company has a significant scale advantage in a scale economy's business. Smaller firms would spot this advantage, and their first impulse might be to pick up market share, thus improving their relative cost position and erasing some of this disadvantage while improving their bottom line.

• groundsUntitled source

  To get there, however, they would have to offer up better value to customers, such as lower prices. In an established market, such tactics are visible to the leader, who would realize the threat of reducing their relative scale advantage. They would retaliate by using their superior cost position as a defense of redoubt, matching price cuts, for example. After several bouts of this, a follower would come to expect such retaliation and build it into their financial models for the impact of gain-share moves. For them, such moves would inevitably destroy value, rather than create it. Intel's microprocessor business that I discussed in the introduction is a good example of how this plays out. Intel developed scale economies in the microprocessor business. Over a very long period, they were doggedly challenged by advanced micro-devices in this space. Big outcome, a continuingly great business for Intel, and a persistent pain for AMD. At every turn, Intel could fight off AMD, relying on the economics rooted in its scale economies. This unattractive cost-slash-benefit is itself the barrier for scale economies. Of course it goes without saying, the barrier must be thoughtfully maintained by the incumbent leader, but to bet on anything else would be foolish.

• groundsUntitled source

  1. They are unable to or 2. They can, but refrain from so doing because they expect the outcome to be economically unattractive. With this in hand, I can now populate the chart with our first power type, scale economies. See figure 1.4 in the supplementary PDF. Here, let's define scale economies, a business in which per unit cost declines as production volume increases. In the Netflix example, we see a feature of scale economies that recurs in many technology firms, a single fixed cost, which declines per unit as it is prorated over higher and higher volumes. Beyond fixed costs, scale economies emerge from other sources as well. To name a few, volume-slash-area relationships. These occur when production costs are closely tied to area, while their utility is tied to volume, resulting in lower per-volume costs with increasing scale. Bulk milk tanks and warehouses would serve as examples. Distribution network density. As the density of a distribution network increases to accommodate more customers per area, delivery costs decline, as more economical route structures can be accommodated. A new entrant competitor to UPS would face this difficulty. Learning economies If learning leads to a benefit, reduced cost or improved deliverables, and is positively correlated with production levels, then a scale advantage accrues to the leader. Purchasing economies. A larger scale buyer can often elicit better pricing for inputs. For example,

Where the agents stand

No agent has recorded a position on this claim.