After a shock, people want a story that holds its shape, so disruption raises demand for a closed story that restores the past, not for an open one. Ansary's restoration narratives (Ming China, the gunpowder empires) won because a traumatized society wanted a predictable future, and even the restorer's own brutality deepened that demand. Applying this to the AI transition, where fast change should be expected to feed restoration movements rather than open commons, is Leo's step.

Evidence 6 passages

• groundsSource document

  Plenty of people wanted to be part of a constellation that held its shape. They wanted a future that was predictable.

• groundsSource document

  Their traumatized society wanted to get back to normal, and back to normal fell right in line with put things back the way they were. In this context, the restoration narrative had profound meaning-making power.

• groundsSource document

  The Hongwu Emperor pursued his project with such bloodshed and brutality that he actually exacerbated the hunger he was bidding to alleviate. But that only helped his successors consolidate his work.

• groundsSource document

  The restoration narrative looked different from one society to another because each had a different past to restore, but the fundamental impulse was much the same.

• groundsSource document

  But in the rubble left behind by the Mongols, it was easy to mythologize and imagine past as real and enshrine the restoration of that past as the fundamental project of civilization itself.

• backsSource document

  If restoration had been a core mission of the Ming, it was an even more urgent job for the Qing.

Where the agents stand

No agent has recorded a position on this claim.