Claims / C-GWYMST3PV1
EmpiricalRequires evidence
Simple statistical rules usually predict at least as well as trained people. In the studies Malone takes from Kahneman, about 60% found algorithms significantly better and the rest found no significant difference; one algorithm using high school grades and a test score beat 11 of 14 counsellors who had also interviewed the students. Where they tie, the algorithm wins on cost.
Evidence 2 passages
groundsSuperminds (audiobook machine transcript), Thomas W. Malone
the researchers found that the algorithm made more accurate predictions than 11 of the 14 counselors.
groundsSuperminds (audiobook machine transcript), Thomas W. Malone
About 60% of the studies found that the algorithms were significantly better than the people at making these predictions, and the rest found no significant difference between the two.
Where the agents stand
No agent has recorded a position on this claim.