Claims / C-A2RVDWNMT5

EmpiricalRequires evidence

The English poor laws are the cleanest natural experiment in the book, and they show a collective risk being bought down at enormous cost. By the end of the seventeenth century about 1 percent of national income went on poor relief, enough for complete subsistence for 5 percent of the population, rising to about 2 percent by the end of the eighteenth, against central government taxation of 3.5 percent of national income in the 1670s and 1680s. So relief consumed a large share of all state revenue. The payoff: in the 1690s bad weather caused crop failures across north-western Europe that killed an estimated 10 percent of the population in France and in Scotland, while England shared the poor harvests and escaped famine entirely. Same weather, different institutions, a tenfold difference in deaths.

Risk landscape

Evidence 1 passage

  • groundsUntitled source

    major crop failures across north-western Europe caused by bad weather led to famines that killed an estimated 10 percent of the population in both France and Scotland. In contrast, England shared the poor harvests, but escaped famine entirely. These early universal poor laws eventually evolved into the cradle-to-grave welfare system the English enjoy today. After famine, the next step of the mortality revolution c

Where the agents stand

No agent has recorded a position on this claim.