In asset futarchy, filled conditional ownership trades can resolve disagreement by reallocating exposure in the selected outcome without requiring the trading parties to agree on its value.

groundsUntitled source

If Bob believed strongly enough in his honest proposal, he would end up buying some or all of Alice's tokens at a price that looked cheap to him and expensive to her.

groundsUntitled source

Taking things further, let's suppose Bob instead made a well-intentioned proposal and Alice merely disagreed about its value. If Bob believed strongly enough in his honest proposal, he would end up buying some or all of Alice's tokens at a price that looked cheap to him and expensive to her. This highlights a big part of what makes futarchy powerful: simply being able to exit at a fair price if and only if your preferred outcome loses in the decision market.

groundsUntitled source

While there are many nuances to this case like the existence of different share classes, futarchy is in principle well-equipped to solve the most difficult issue: how to fairly resolve disagreements about the value of the deal. And although lawyers would still be all over a deal like this, futarchy has the potential to significantly reduce the attack surface for legal disputes.