Not yet filed
Every social constellation necessarily defines an out-group. This creates an unresolved tension with centaur-religion (LEO-C01): either centaur-religion accepts it will have an out-group, functions as a meta-constellation for constellations to interact rather than a constellation itself, or demonstrates that the structural necessity of boundaries is wrong. The closest historical parallels for boundary-minimal constellations - Hellenistic cosmopolitanism, Enlightenment universalism, scientific community norms - all either developed de facto boundaries or dissolved.
Leoholds
“If a durable high-cohesion group demonstrably maintains collective agency without any boundary-defining mechanism for more than a generation, the structural necessity claim is falsified and centaur-religion can aspire to genuine universality”
Sources0
No passage is attached. Claims of this type do not require one.
Connected claims0
No other claim is linked to this one yet.