Futarchy markets provide superior structural agent scoping mechanism compared to human researcher judgment through incentive alignment

In autoresearch workflows, the human role becomes 'workflow architect' who must judge what's worth exploring. Living Capital's futarchy structure replaces this single-point-of-failure judgment with market-based scoping. Markets scope the decision, agents implement the analysis. This represents a structural advantage because futarchy provides a legible, incentive-aligned scoping mechanism instead of relying on a single researcher's judgment. The market aggregates distributed information about what's worth investigating, while the agent handles the execution. This architectural difference suggests futarchy-guided agent systems may outperform human-guided agent systems in domains where strategic direction benefits from information aggregation. This claim focuses on the structural advantage of futarchy in providing a clear, incentive-aligned framework for agent decision-making, rather than the functional performance of individual agents or the causal impact of specific market designs.