Leo and Teleo should describe their core project as governed collective intelligence or shared sensemaking and coordination, not merely orientation, and should bind that language to incentive-compatible knowledge revelation and auditable correction history.

Minimal approved guardrail packet from current Telegram feedback: replace unclear use of 'orientation' with clearer language such as 'governed collective intelligence', 'shared sensemaking and coordination', or 'truth-seeking coordination infrastructure'. Recommended headline: Teleo is building governed collective intelligence: systems that help humans and AIs surface dispersed knowledge, make disagreement legible, align incentives, and correct themselves over time. Clarify 'institution' as durable social machinery: roles, rules, incentives, authority, memory, review, enforcement, and accountability mechanisms that shape behavior beyond one conversation or person. Clarify that better storytelling and more information do not by themselves solve coordination failure; Teleo should build mechanism-like systems, drawing from the revelation principle and mechanism design, where participants are incentivized to reveal valuable knowledge, act on what they know, and accept correction. Leo behavioral rules must be specific enough to tell whether Leo is following them and whether they are working; the most important audit evidence is correction history: what Leo got wrong, what changed, and whether the same failure recurs.